Archive - Bible RSS Feed

Why We Need Pain

I came across this post by Dave Gibbons in Relevant Magazine and found it very “relevant” in our understanding of the Jesus story. For many years I just did the 1-2 -1 – 2 Cycle and never understood the value of actually embracing my wounds, my shame, my sin and sitting in the mess of it long enough for God to heal me. My pastor told me something I will never forget “repentance is not a prayer you pray in a moment but the long walk of obedience”. I encourage you to move past repentance to a place of experiencing transformation.

May you live death and resurrection for it is the way of God!

Five ways to come to terms with your scars.

Pain is a bitter pill to swallow. Who wants to feel the sting of failure or the overwhelming hurt of brokenness in our relationships?

And when pain inevitably comes, our response is fairly predictable—we complain, run away and get depressed. Sometimes we turn our pain outward to others and become abusive. Often, we turn inward and beat ourselves up, repeating lies that eventually become our truth and de?ne our fragmented reality.

Learning to embrace our pain is a process that I describe as the “pain continuum.” The pain continuum helps us understand how we usually cope with our pain and gives us insight that can lead to maturity and growth.

Stage 1: Covering

The initial stage of the continuum occurs when we ?rst experience pain. Pain is the natural repercussion of dealing with our brokenness. Our immediate response to this type of pain is to deny it. Even if we are forced to acknowledge what is happening, we seek a way of avoiding the pain. Some people never get past this stage. They live in an unhealthy state of denial. The pain only worsens. Certainly, it can be numbed at times, but it?s never truly better. A person living in denial falls prey to a constant dullness of heart, leading a disengaged life, and avoiding choices and commitments that might lead to additional episodes of brokenness. Eventually life becomes a work of projecting a false self. This just adds more stress.

When we act in a way that is different from what we know is honest, we lack power in our lives. We can fool people, but our voices lack resonance. Over time, this leads us to hide who we are and cover up our weaknesses. Just like Adam and Eve in the Garden of Eden, we are no longer comfortable being transparent in the light of God?s truth, and we respond to our pain by hiding and covering. A dissonance rises between what we say and who we really know we are.

Stage 2: Confession

Sometimes, though, people come to a place of recognizing that something is wrong with their lives. They are able to admit that not all is right. Biblically, the act of confession is when we come to agree with God about our issues: our sins and all the ways in which we?ve missed the mark. When we agree with God, we take the ?rst step toward exiting the rut of denial. Since our failure is constant, confession becomes part of the normal rhythm of those who follow Jesus.

The temptation for most of us is to stop growing at the moment of confession. We confess our failure or the pains others have caused us. We ask God to take the pain away, hoping for instant transformation and healing. But as we struggle with the wounds others have inflicted or our own addictions, whether to alcohol or drugs, or to materialism, money and worldly success, we must recount that we are weak and that change is rarely instantaneous.

Stage 3: Embrace

The stage of embrace is what enables a person to take responsibility for his or her sin and to see failure and healing as an integral part of the growth process. Along with our positive attributes and gifts, we also have scars that de?ne who we are. In this stage, an individual accepts shortcomings and the fact that he or she desperately needs grace.

To be clear: the movement toward embrace is not a tacit “oh well,” a casual acceptance of our sins. Embracing our broken humanity is not an attempt to solve our sin problem or forever end the pain. Instead, it?s about living in the tension of our ongoing brokenness and at the same time the good news of our position as children of God.

In fact, as we mature in our faith, we grow more sensitive to our weaknesses, to the things that we once ignored or paid little attention to. As we draw closer to the light, our scars are more noticeable. Perhaps this is what the apostle Paul was thinking when he described himself as the “worst of sinners” in his letter to Timothy. The more Paul became aware of God?s goodness, the more he became aware of his own failures. Paul understood and managed the tension between his identity as a child of God—saved by grace—and his ongoing struggle with sin.

Stage 4: Guide

As we learn to recognize our scars as gifts, they eventually become guides for our lives. Too often, we are motivated by our strengths. We run toward the things we are good at. We avoid the things we aren?t good at. We attempt to ignore our more noticeable character defects. Yet as we begin to appreciate God?s shaping hand in our lives, we become grateful for His molding our character through pain. In the process, we discover our true calling, the way of the cross. Our pain and weakness become the pillars that God uses as a platform, a place where we can stand and speak into the lives of others.

Nehemiah, the heroic rebuilder of the walls of Jerusalem, found his purpose through devastation. His vision grew out of his deep sorrow over the destruction of his city. God used his pain to redirect his life. Nehemiah returned to Jerusalem, a place of destruction and failure, and became the leader of the rebuilding effort. As he addressed his own pain, God illuminated his destiny.

Stage 5: Gift

The next stage of maturation occurs when our perspective on pain changes. In this stage, we allow the Holy Spirit to redeem our pain for the sake of the greater good. Our pain keeps us humble and dependent on the Lord.

I have also experienced the perfecting power of pain. God has shaped me through some of my most obvious abnormalities and struggles: the challenge of my multiracial roots, being a minority, witnessing my parents? divorce, my mom?s sudden death, failures in the workplace, and broken relationships with my wife, my children, my church, and my friends. These experiences have taught me that God uses all of our story—the pain and struggle—to advance His Kingdom.

Another aspect of this maturation is that when we connect with others in community, we discover that it is our particular pain, not our strengths, that enables others to relate to us most intimately. Pain, in this sense, becomes God?s gift to us. We all want to make a difference in the world. We all want to connect with others in some way. Pain is the common ground God gives us to meet people, regardless of their cultural background or personal history. People can understand the pain of disappointment, of loss, of failure.

St. Augustine writes, “In my deepest wound, I see your glory, and it dazzles me.”

Our pain becomes the scars for people to see the healing power of our great God. Not only does He heal; He transforms what could have destroyed us. – Dave Gibbons

Will change ever happen?  Can a person ever be whole again?  The answer is YES!  The process doesn’t happen over night but there is hope.  Often times the pain we feel and go through is exactly what God uses in our lives to help others.  You are not alone in your pain, there are others too who are walking a similar path and there is One who can heal you of your pain.  Are you hurting today?  There is hope.  Listen to what Psalm 40:1-3 says,

“I waited patiently for the Lord to help me,
and he turned to me and heard my cry.
2 He lifted me out of the pit of despair,
out of the mud and the mire.
He set my feet on solid ground
and steadied me as I walked along.
3 He has given me a new song to sing,
a hymn of praise to our God.
Many will see what he has done and be amazed.
They will put their trust in the Lord.”

Why Missional Ventures Fail?

Church Planters take special note of Ben Sternke’s post. I am reminded of what Jeff Vandersteldt said to me when I asked him “If you could do anything different what would that be?” and he answered… “We sent people out on mission without a clear Gospel identity and without the power and presence of the Spirit.” We need to equip and release… it is what Jesus did!

Why do some missional ventures that look so good “on paper” fail so miserably in real life? Why do some of the best-laid plans for mission end up not actually accomplishing all that much? Because of how I’m wired up, I have a propensity to believe that an efficient system, a simple plan, an elegant strategy should automatically yield good results. But this just isn’t the case sometimes. Why is that?

One answer, I think, has to do with the relationship between discipleship and mission (yes, I know we shouldn’t bifurcate those two things from a theological standpoint, but from a practical standpoint I think it will help us). Last year my friend Tim Catchim wrote a little blog post that got me thinking about this. (Incidentally, Tim has also recently published a fantastic book with Alan Hirsch called The Permanent Revolution.)

In the post, Tim quotes Karl Weick, who writes, in his book Making Sense of the Organization,

whenever you have what appears to be successful decentralization, if you look more closely, you will discover that it was always preceded by a period of intense centralization where a set of core values were hammered out and socialized into people before the people were turned loose to go their own “independent, autonomous” ways.

Think of decentralization as mission, and centralization as discipleship. It seems to me that when we push for rapid mobilization for mission before taking the time to build a solid foundation of discipleship, we see ineffective or short-lived mission. The way Tim put it was “decentralization before discipleship equals dissipation. Decentralization after discipleship equals movement.”

Discipleship is the “intense centralization” process that happens before the “decentralization” of mission. Discipleship is where the core values are hammered out, where people are socialized into a new way of life before being “turned loose” to join Jesus in the renewal of all things. The disciples were trained extensively by Jesus for three years before being sent to “make disciples of all peoples.”

The problem is, as Tim points out, that most of the centralization/discipleship that occurs in churches is purely information-based. We expect a sermon/Sunday service to be sufficient for training, equipping, forming God’s people as disciples of Christ. As most of us know, it ain’t working. This is not the kind of centralization we need.

We ought to take our cues from the way Jesus “centralized” his own disciples. He did teach them, of course, giving them a theology of the kingdom that took awhile to digest. He wasn’t light on information! But he also lived out his mission in front of them, and then invited them to do what he was doing. In short, the disciples were able to imitate the things Jesus was doing, and this formed a key part of their training regimen in missional living.

3DM has a useful tool for talking about this process, shown below:

“Innovation” is the goal (disciples living out their missional calling, making more disciples of Jesus). But we can’t get there if all we do is give great information. We also need to offer our lives as an example to imitate. So Jesus gave them the Sermon on the Mount (information), but he also sent them out two-by-two do cast out demons and heal the sick (imitation). Imitation is the missing ingredient in most of our discipling (centralization) processes.

Thus one reason missional ventures fail, whether they be church plants or missional communties or training programs, is that we attempt to decentralize before we have sufficiently centralized. We try to send folks out on mission without really discipling them into a way of life that will sustain mission. We try to get them to move into missional innovation without giving them adequate experiences of imitation first. -  by Ben Sternke

Why Is It So Hard To Do What Jesus Did?

Mike breen had a guest post by Paul Maconochie, the pastor at St Thomas Philadelphia. Paul was the pastor who followed Mike at Philadelphia and now, 8 years later, it is one of fastest growing churches in Europe, doing some incredibly imaginative things in a truly post-Christian context. I hope you enjoy the series, and if you’d like to read a little on the history of St Thomas, check out this blog post on how I chose Movement over Mega.

In our Canadian context I am pretty convinced we can learn much from Europe but in this post you should have one of those duh moments…  we just need to get back to doing what Jesus did. As pastors we need to embrace the challenge of being a disciple who lives out my faith on mission and and makes other disciples. Embrace the challenge…

When I trained at seminary to become a Minister, there were a number of assumptions that were made about what that ministry was going to look like.

The major focus was on theology, because of course it would be my job to make sure that my future congregation understood the Bible in the right way. Other key components included pastoral care and a little on how to preach. I had no training in leadership, no training in what it means to be a disciple or to disciple others (other than Bible study), no training in how to build or facilitate effective evangelism.

My training was equipping and shaping me to fulfill a certain role; one that most churches in the UK expect their Pastors to perform and one that most Church leaders go along with. The role I was being trained for was this:

  • To look after the people of the church and care for them
  • To teach the people and to feed them spiritually.
  • To help them to be comfortable and healthy as they try to live good lives in a difficult world.

The huge problem with this is that it’s a million miles away from the model of discipleship presented in the Bible. In fact, it could be argued that it’s the exact opposite. Jesus said:

“The kings of the Gentiles lord it over them; and those who exercise authority over them call themselves Benefactors. But you are not to be like that. Instead, the greatest among you should be like the youngest, and the one who rules like the one who serves.” (Luke 22: 25-26)

A benefactor is someone who provides for other people and in return is able to exercise some degree of control over their lives. The provision of a benefactor can be financial, intellectual, social or spiritual; sometimes it can be all of these. Pastors in the Church seem to have entered into a ‘benefactor agreement’ with their congregations, where they are expected to be the providers of what people need pastorally and spiritually.

We have ‘taken hold of that for which the Church has taken hold of us’ instead of taking hold of that for which Christ has taken hold of us. When we do this, we effectively become like a ‘shell’, insulating people from the life of discipleship that Jesus has called them into, instead of a skeleton supporting and helping people to disciple others. The church becomes like a crab or a wood louse, with the staff surrounding the people with care and teaching, catering to their needs. But what we want to see is the church operating like a human body; arms, legs and torso supported by the skeleton and working together to achieve the commission that the head gives it.

Jesus’ commission is ‘Go and make disciples.’ Are we primarily doing that as leaders? Are we helping the people in our church to do that? If we are not, then are we really fulfilling the commission that Jesus has given us?

In a city with rock-bottom levels of church attendance, we have seen folks coming to know Jesus on a weekly basis. We are seeing hundreds come into our missional communities each year in a country where the average church congregation size is 38. And we are not just producing consumer-Christians, but believers who get straight back out there, discipling others. Why is that? What have we done that is different?

I believe that it starts with us as leaders.

  • Rather than providing pastoral care, we should be building a culture and supporting structures so that our people care for each other.
  • Rather than providing spiritual food, we should be equipping our people to access God’s Word and receive food from Jesus directly.
  • Rather than making people into clients for what we provide, we should be making disciples who can in turn go and make disciples.

We can do this by ‘pruning’ out a lot of the management we do, and then start living the life. We form a core community, live life-on-life and reach out to others to bring them into the Kingdom. Like Jesus, we identify and call a group of disciples to go on the journey with us and ask them to do the same. We percolate this throughout the whole church.

by Paul Maconochie

We do our job of making disciples and let Jesus do His job of building the church.

Learning From Eugene

Please watch this… If you are a pastor or ministry leader I beg you to watch this!

Click HERE to watch both of the free, one-hour live streams of Eugene Peterson and Gabe Lyons on Practicing Sabbath and Immersed in Scripture.

Re-Imagining Faith and The Call To Faithfulness

I am very thankful for Daniel Kirk and his understanding of scripture. As I read this post this morning something was awakened in my soul…  Maybe because I grew up with a very charismatic understanding of faith where faith was the way to own larger houses and look like you had it all together. The last sentence hit me Believing into Christ means faithfulness to the Christian story, a lived faithfulness that puts that story on display in our own communities, our own lives. In any healthy relationship love does not look like big gifts(and I love gifts), getting what I think I need… Faithfulness is the true response to love!

One of the most important debates in NT scholarship for the past 30 years or so has been the interpretation of the Greek phrase ?????? ??????? (pistis christou; “the faith of Christ”).

Basically, it comes down to this: is Paul talking about “faith in Christ” (objective genitive) or “the faithfulness of Christ” (subjective genitive) when he uses this phrase?

In this case, “faithfulness of Christ” would mean Jesus’ faithfulness in going to the cross.

Can pistis mean “faithfulness”?

The answer is decidedly, “Yes.”

In fact, the most unequivocal use of pistis in the book of Romans is one in which it clearly means “faithfulness” rather than faith, and is used in a “subjective genitive” construction.

In Rom 3:3, Paul is reflecting on the “faithlessness” of some who did not believe the gospel. He contrasts this with the faithfulness of God. “Their faithlessness cannot nullify the faithfulness of God, can it?”

Faithfulness of God is the English rendering of ??? ?????? ??? ???? (ten pistin tou theou; “the faith of God”).

Might this help with the conversation we’ve been having here since the end of last week?

The starting question was what we do with final judgment based on works within a system of theology that strongly emphasizes justification (initial judgment?) based on faith.

On Saturday I suggested that we rethink “faith in Christ” as “faithing into Christ,” or “believing unto union with Christ.”

Today I want to raise the question of whether thinking in terms of “faithfulness” might better capture what Paul is after than our normal idea of “belief”?

In order for this to work, we’ll have to rethink the faith versus works contrast. In Romans and Galatians, there are particular works that Paul is eager to deny are at the heart of justification–those that define Jewish people as a particular set-apart people; works that indicate conversion to Judaism as such.

No, says Paul, Gentiles don’t have to become Jewish. Faithing into Christ is enough.

Within this framework, Paul’s claim in Romans 1 makes much more sense. The goal of his ministry is to bring about “the obedience of faith” or, “faithful obedience” among the Gentiles.

Not faith alone, but an obedient faithfulness to the gospel of Jesus Christ.

If we are saved by Christ’s faithfulness in going to death on the cross for us, perhaps our part in continuing the story is to respond with a Christ-shaped faithfulness of our own.

Believing into Christ means faithfulness to the Christian story, a lived faithfulness that puts that story on display in our own communities, our own lives.

When Helping Hurts

As I prepare for my trip to Uganda I am becoming aware of the 1000′s of ways one could mess it up. I have been reading When Helping Hurts, a must read for anyone who works with the poor or in missions. When Helping Hurts provides foundational concepts, clearly articulated general principles and relevant applications. The result is an effective and holistic ministry to the poor, not a truncated gospel. Let me expand…It all starts in how they define poverty…

What is Poverty?

“Poverty is the result of relationships that do not work, that are not just, that are not for life, that are not harmonious or enjoyable. Poverty is the absence of shalom in all its meanings.”Bryant Myers - Walking with the Poor: Principles and Practices of Transformational Development

I find myself asking the question; What would it look like if the Kingdom of God touched down in Bukanaga? (the village we will be visiting in Uganda) and I often think through my Canadian, urban, lens. This is not helpful as it truncates the gospel of the Kingdom.

Poverty is about broken relationships.

“Most Christians lack a biblical foundation for holistic ministry to people who are poor and fail to see how central such ministry is to the church’s mission. At the start of His earthly ministry, Jesus said, “I must preach the good news of the kingdom of God to the other towns also, because that is why I was sent” (Luke 4:43). The kingdom of God is the reconciliation of the entire cosmos through the death and resurrection of Jesus Christ (Colossians 1:19). Jesus and his followers declared the good news of the kingdom through both words and deeds to the blind, the lame, the deaf, the mute, the leper, and the poor (Luke 7:18-23; 9:1-2; 10:9). As His body and fullness, the church is to continue Christ’s work of declaring his kingdom—in both words and deeds—to the “least of these” (Matthew 25:40). Unfortunately, the evangelical world has been paralyzed by a truncated gospel which reduces the reign of Christ to saving souls, thereby undermining the biblical concern for the whole person. 

How we answer the question – What is poverty? – determines the solutions we propose. A misdiagnosis of the problems related to poverty results in remedies that are ineffectual and even harmful. Good intentions are not enough. Unfortunately, Christians often have faulty assumptions about the root causes of poverty and its solutions. As a result, we often end up hurting people living in poverty and ourselves in the process of trying to help them.”  - Chalmers Centre – www.chalmers.org

In order to help people in poverty we need to have a biblically consistent framework which conceives of poverty as being rooted in the effects of the fall on the four foundational relationships that God established for each person: relationships with God, self, others, and creation. When defined in this way, at our base level we’re all poor because none of us experience the fullness that God intended for each of these relationships. For the economically poor, these broken relationships often include shame, a marred identity, social isolation, and a lack of a sense of vocation that contribute to a lack of income. For the economically rich, these broken relationships manifest themselves in pride, selfishness, workaholic tendencies, materialism, etc. that lead to all sorts of individual and social ills. Unfortunately, when the economically rich interact with the economically poor, they tend to do so in such a way that exacerbates the shame that the economically poor feel, while also exacerbating the pride of the economically rich. Central to poverty alleviation is embracing our own mutual brokenness so that we can truly help others without hurting them and ourselves.

What you take with you is not your money but your brokenness… because you need the gospel to.

How God Became King – NT Wright

N.T. Wright has a new book coming out on March 13th (He is cranking them out these days). It’s called How God Became King: the forgotten story of the gospels. Here, he talks about the themes in the book a bit.

Storied Theology

I was listening to Eugene Peterson today and was completely inspired by his view of scripture. He was encouraging his listeners to continually read and acquaint ourselves with the whole story and then our role as disciple makers, pastors, leaders, is to bring the story of our friends into the story of the Bible not the other way around. All too often we read the Bible in too narrow a focus and we get too individual applying our lives to what the Bible says. It must be the other way around… how does your story fit into and align with Gods story?

Daniel Kirk from Fuller Theological Seminary describes Storied Theology…

What we think the Bible is will deeply impact how we read it and what we try to do with it.

To be clear: even if you don’t have a clear answer to the question, “What is the Bible?” there are Christian-cultural markers that have created assumptions for you (either by acceptance of them or rejection of them) concerning what the Bible is and, therefore, what we should do with it.

What I want to make clear today, if it wasn’t clear yesterday, is that narrative theology can carry a strong imperatival force–it can issue a summons to act in certain ways. But it does so by a different route than the instruction manual approach.

Narrative theology takes the overarching story as the key to what the Bible is. Not key in the sense that it opens some other door, but key in the sense that even the parts of scripture that are not, themselves, stories nonetheless find their coherence and interpretive framework from the larger story in which they are embedded.

More than that, narrative theology recognizes the inherently storied nature of all human life.

“Story is a basic principle of mind. Most of our experience, our knowledge, and our thinking is organized as stories… narrative imagining is our fundamental form of predicting [and our] fundamental cognitive instrument for explanation.” (Mark Turner, The Literary Mind [v, 20])

So here’s where narrative theology strikes pay dirt: it provides a way of thinking and talking about the Bible and the Christian story using the category by which we are making sense of all reality.

We tell stories about our Christian communities: where we came from, what we believe, what we do. Narrative theology says: the Story of your community is the story of the crucified and risen Christ–how does your story retell the Story that defines it?

Narrative theology draws in our sacramental practices. What are we doing when we take the bread and cup? We are enacting the story that not only founds us, but that we are called to be living illustrations of in our life together. It is not some “other” thing we tack on, the sacrament is the thing that we are, in a different mode.

As individuals we have stories, too. Often these are stories shaped by loss, by shame, by guilt, by pain. And I wonder if having those stories both embraced within and at the same time relativized by a greater defining story of a crucified and risen Christ isn’t part of the narrative reframing that God intends for God’s people when we are joined to the story of Israel that has its climax in the story of the crucified and risen Christ.

Narrative theology is about (to borrow a phrase from Richard Hays) “conversion of the imagination,” or, to take the language of Rom 12, being transformed by the renewing of our minds. This is a much harder business than turning to the Bible as a reference manual for correct behavior. It involves a lifetime’s depth of familiarity with the story and a commitment to make that story not only our own as persons but also our own as a people.

The story defines who we are. And as we learn that identity, we acquire the wisdom of knowing what we should do so as to be living enactments of that story in the corners of the world to which God has called us.

Changing The World Through Cities

Tim Keller recently spoke at Second Presbyterian Church in Memphis, Tennessee on “Changing the World Through Cities.”

Go listen and/or download.

The Cost of Non-Discipleship

With credentialling and travel last week, board meetings, planning our mission trip to Uganda… I am finding no margin for blogging. So here is a great post by Ben Sternke on the Cost of Non-Discipleship, to keep you thinking.

After reading a great little article from Andy Crouch it’s burning in my heart again: Discipleship to Jesus is the best deal we’re ever going to get as human beings. It is an amazing bargain that any sober-minded shopper would jump at. It should feel to good to be true. Being with Jesus to learn from him how to be like him is the most remarkable opportunity ever offered to the human race.

Crouch’s article is about Jesus’ stories in Luke 14 about a tower builder and an embattled king. He points out that in most English Bibles, this section is labelled “The Cost of Discipleship,” but, he says, “Jesus’ first hearers would have known that label was exactly backwards. For these stories are not about disciples, but fools.”

The tower builder doesn’t have enough money to finish his project. The king doesn’t have enough troops to win the battle.These aren’t models of discipleship, they’re models of non-discipleship. They are pictures of people trying to gain security through their own resources and strength, ambitiously trying to build monuments to their own ingenuity and ability. It’s a picture of people trying to get well-liked enough or rich enough or powerful enough to secure a place for themselves. It’s the tower of Babel all over again.

In other words, Jesus is saying, “Stop your foolish pursuit of security and reputation before you go spiritually bankrupt! Can’t you see you’ll never be able to complete your project? You’re throwing your life away on a pipe dream that you’ll never be able to pay for. Give up the foolishness, and come follow me instead.”

Which is exactly the same point Jesus is making when he says, “Whoever wants to save their life will lose it, but whoever loses their life for me will find it. What good will it be for someone to gain the whole world, yet forfeit their life?” The life you “give up” to follow Jesus is a ill-fated tower-building project that won’t work out anyway. It’s much more costly to keep on trying to finish your tower, because in the end you’ll fail, you’ll forfeit your life for a half-baked tower.

At our Missional Community gathering this past Sunday someone paraphrased Dallas Willard: “If you think it’s hard being a disciple of Christ, you should try living the other way.” This is exactly what Jesus was saying in these stories: living to make a name for yourself or secure your own future is way too expensive. Stop now before you ruin yourself utterly. Jesus was talking in these stories about the cost of non-discipleship, and it’s breathtakingly high.

In contrast, living as a disciple of Jesus means that you begin to understand what living really is. You “find your life,” as Jesus tells us. Another Willard quote gives us a picture of what we gain as disciples of Jesus:

“What an astonishing vision! The water of heaven flows through our being until we are fully changed people. We wake each morning breathing the air of this new world; we experience a new consciousness, and our character is transformed. We drop our deceitful practices, our insincerity, our defensiveness, our envy, and our slander, and we move outward toward others in genuine love.”

(from Revolution of Character, ht @jontyson)

It isn’t “costly” to obtain this kind of life, you simply give up the old life and receive the new one as a gift. Those who engage in it aren’t spiritual heroes, they’re just responding to the deal of a lifetime. It’s the treasure in the field. Of course you sell everything to buy the field. There’s a treasure in it! 

 

Page 1 of 1012345»...Last »